Claude vs Tesseract
Tesseract is cheaper per page; Tesseract is faster; only Claude supports tables, handwriting, math.
Claudeanthropic/claude | Tesseracttesseract/tesseract | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | Open source |
| Price | 14 credits / page | Free |
| Per 1,000 pages | $14.00 | $0.00 |
| Typical speed | 2.6 s / page | 0.6 s / page |
| Best for | Long dense documents | Clean printed text, free |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 50+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | No |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Try both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Result
Your Markdown or JSON shows up here.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "anthropic/claude",
"fallbacks": ["tesseract/tesseract"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}