Claude vs Amazon Textract
Amazon Textract is cheaper per page; Amazon Textract is faster; only Claude supports math, multilingual; only Amazon Textract supports forms, bounding boxes, confidence.
Claudeanthropic/claude | Amazon Textractaws/textract | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Vision model | OCR API |
| Price | 14 credits / page | 6 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $14.00 | $6.00 |
| Typical speed | 2.6 s / page | 1.2 s / page |
| Best for | Long dense documents | Forms and key-value extraction |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 50+ languages | 6 languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 3,000 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Math | ✓ Yes | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | No | ✓ Yes |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | No |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Available |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Amazon Textract
AWS OCR with form key-value pairs, tables and per-word confidence scores.
Amazon Textract detailsTry both on your own file
Run the file once with each model and compare the output.
Result
Your Markdown or JSON shows up here.
Use one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "anthropic/claude",
"fallbacks": ["aws/textract"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}