EasyOCR vs Google Cloud Vision OCR
EasyOCR is cheaper per page; EasyOCR is faster; only Google Cloud Vision OCR supports handwriting.
EasyOCRjaided/easyocr | Google Cloud Vision OCRgoogle/cloud-vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | OCR API |
| Price | 1 credits / page | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 0.9 s / page | 1.0 s / page |
| Best for | Quick scripts and scene text | Photos and simple scans |
| Inputs | images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 80+ languages | 100+ languages |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 2,000 |
| Tables | No | No |
| Handwriting | No | ✓ Yes |
| Math | No | No |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
EasyOCR
Python OCR library with a simple API. Returns text lines with boxes and confidence.
EasyOCR detailsGoogle Cloud Vision OCR
Google Cloud's image OCR with text and document text detection, word boxes and confidence.
Google Cloud Vision OCR detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "jaided/easyocr",
"fallbacks": ["google/cloud-vision"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}