Marker vs OCRmyPDF
OCRmyPDF is cheaper per page; OCRmyPDF is faster; only Marker supports tables, math, bounding boxes.
Markerdatalab/marker | OCRmyPDFocrmypdf/ocrmypdf | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 14 credits / page | 1 credit / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $14.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 2.5 s / page | 1.0 s / page |
| Best for | Books and research papers | Searchable PDFs from scans |
| Inputs | PDF, images, DOCX | PDF, images |
| Languages | 90+ languages | 100+ languages (via Tesseract) |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | No |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | No |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Marker
Hosted version of the open-source Marker and Surya models. Strong on books and papers.
Marker detailsOCRmyPDF
Command-line tool that adds a searchable text layer to scanned PDFs, using Tesseract.
OCRmyPDF detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "datalab/marker",
"fallbacks": ["ocrmypdf/ocrmypdf"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}