Reducto Parse vs TrOCR
TrOCR is cheaper per page; TrOCR is faster; only Reducto Parse supports tables, forms, bounding boxes, confidence; only TrOCR supports handwriting.
Reducto Parsereducto/parse | TrOCRmicrosoft/trocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 20 credits / page | 1 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $20.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 4.0 s / page | 1.2 s / page |
| Best for | High-stakes complex documents | Handwritten text lines |
| Inputs | PDF, images, DOCX | images |
| Languages | 50+ languages | English |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 100 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | No |
| Handwriting | No | ✓ Yes |
| Math | No | No |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | No |
| Confidence | ✓ Yes | No |
| Forms | ✓ Yes | No |
| Multilingual | No | No |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Reducto Parse
High-accuracy parsing for complex financial and legal documents, with citations.
Reducto Parse detailsTrOCR
Transformer text recognition model. Reads single text lines, including handwriting.
TrOCR detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "reducto/parse",
"fallbacks": ["microsoft/trocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}