Tesseract vs olmOCR
Tesseract is cheaper per page; Tesseract is faster; only Tesseract supports multilingual; only olmOCR supports tables, math, handwriting.
Tesseracttesseract/tesseract | olmOCRallenai/olmocr | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | Open source |
| Price | Free | 2 credits / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $0.00 | $2.00 |
| Typical speed | 0.6 s / page | 1.5 s / page |
| Best for | Clean printed text, free | Bulk PDF to text for datasets |
| Inputs | PDF, images | PDF, images |
| Languages | 100+ languages | Mainly English |
| Max pages per request | 500 | 1,000 |
| Tables | No | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | ✓ Yes |
| Math | No | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | No |
| On OCRRouter | Available | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
olmOCR
Open-source vision model from Ai2 that turns PDFs into clean, reading-order text.
olmOCR detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "tesseract/tesseract",
"fallbacks": ["allenai/olmocr"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}