LlamaParse vs Granite Docling
Granite Docling is cheaper per page; Granite Docling is faster; only LlamaParse supports multilingual.
LlamaParsellamaindex/llamaparse | Granite Doclingibm/granite-docling | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | OCR API | Open source |
| Price | 5 credits / page | 1 credit / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $5.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 3.0 s / page | 1.5 s / page |
| Best for | RAG ingestion | Small-model document conversion |
| Inputs | PDF, images, DOCX | PDF, images |
| Languages | 80+ languages | English, experimental CJK and Arabic |
| Max pages per request | 1,000 | 500 |
| Tables | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Handwriting | No | No |
| Math | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Bounding boxes | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | No |
| Multilingual | ✓ Yes | No |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
Granite Docling
Compact IBM vision model that converts pages to DocTags for the Docling pipeline.
Granite Docling detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "llamaindex/llamaparse",
"fallbacks": ["ibm/granite-docling"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}