TrOCR vs Donut
Donut is faster; only TrOCR supports handwriting; only Donut supports forms.
TrOCRmicrosoft/trocr | Donutnaver/donut | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Open source | Open source |
| Price | 1 credit / page | 1 credit / page |
| Per 1,000 pages | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Typical speed | 1.2 s / page | 1.0 s / page |
| Best for | Handwritten text lines | Receipt and form fields after fine-tuning |
| Inputs | images | images |
| Languages | English | English, Chinese, Japanese, Korean |
| Max pages per request | 100 | 100 |
| Tables | No | No |
| Handwriting | ✓ Yes | No |
| Math | No | No |
| Bounding boxes | No | No |
| Confidence | No | No |
| Forms | No | ✓ Yes |
| Multilingual | No | No |
| On OCRRouter | Coming soon | Coming soon |
Prices are what you pay on OCRRouter. Speed is the provider's typical figure, not a benchmark we ran.
What each one is
TrOCR
Transformer text recognition model. Reads single text lines, including handwriting.
TrOCR detailsDonut
OCR-free document understanding model. Fine-tuned for receipts, forms and document Q&A.
Donut detailsUse one, fall back to the other
Request body
{
"model": "microsoft/trocr",
"fallbacks": ["naver/donut"],
"file_url": "https://example.com/document.pdf"
}